Impact Assessment of Divergence on Post-approval Changes Classifications of Latin America Region With Europe and the United States, and Propositions to Harmonize Classification Based on Risk as a Path to Build the Trust Between National Regulatory Agencies.

The lack of harmonization in the post-approval changes (PACs) classifications for pharmaceutical products may have an impact on the efficient implementation of PACs and in the supply of medicine, jeopardizing the continuity of therapies, especially in the case of chronic diseases. The percentage of similarity between the PACs classifications existing between countries of Latin America (Mexico, Brazil, Colombia, Venezuela, Argentina, Chile, Ecuador, Peru, and Central America) versus Europe and the United States (US) has been calculated, focused on the PACs for chemical products and on the minor and moderate variations as defined in the European Union (EU)1,2 and US3 regulations. Even though Mexico, Colombia, Brazil, and Argentina implemented a risk-based PACs classification, a wide diversity is observed, with a high percentage of variations classified as major or high risk for these countries and the rest of the Latin American countries, except for Venezuela (which previously adopted and recognized the EU classification). In addition, we identified a group/subset of PACs that are not categorized in the regulations of Mexico, Brazil, Chile, and Central America countries. Considering that Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina are members or observers of the International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use4 and the Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme,5 these countries could further align their PACs classification with the EU and US regulations. This could also be an opportunity for other countries of the Latin America region to recognize and adopt PACs classifications aligned to the EU or United States, which would also support the inclusion of reliance processes in their regulation for already considered/recognized reference countries. This would guarantee more health authority efficiency and optimization as well as more uniform implementation of PACs globally.

Dynamic Regulatory Assessment: Unpacking the Process Reveals Readiness to Pilot for Europe-An EFPIA View.

The medicines regulatory network of the European Economic Area comprises 30 countries, their National Competent Authorities (NCA), and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The NCAs and EMA are involved at different stages of the medicine life cycle; not all are engaged in a particular medicine's development discussions. As a result, knowledge management (ie, acquisition and transfer between medicine developer and the NCAs) is fragmented and inefficient. Dynamic regulatory assessment (DRA), a regulatory science concept developed by the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA), could drive increased connectedness supporting more continuous knowledge building. DRA works via iterative release and assessment of discrete data packets (DDPs) at mutually agreed milestones during development, culminating in more efficient development and faster authorization. This commentary seeks to build on an earlier article by unpacking the DRA concept, with a particular focus on DDPs. Its aim is to show how DDPs can support efficient and predictable release of data to encourage development and assessment of promising medicines, and it makes the case for piloting the DRA concept with European regulators now.